appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Nicholas Spiro

The long-standing rivalry between Asia’s two leading financial centres is heating up. As Hong Kong and Singapore compete harder for investment talent, tax incentives for fund managers have emerged as the new battleground.
A government bill working its way through Hong Kong’s Legislative Council would result in sweeping changes to tax rules on carried interest. The legislation, which is expected to be approved later this year, would offer preferential tax treatment to a wider range of alternative investment groups.
The move by Hong Kong prompted a swift response from Singapore. On August 19, Singapore’s central bank announced a package of measures designed to enhance the appeal of the asset management industry, including a proposal that would exempt a share of profits made by fund managers when they deliver strong returns for investors in qualifying funds.
Wall Street banks are already assessing the broader implications of the reforms. In a report on July 31, Citigroup said the changes to Hong Kong’s preferential tax regime were “a structural catalyst for capital and talent inflows into [Hong Kong]” that would support demand in the real estate market.
If 3 per cent of fund managers from mainland China and Singapore relocated to Hong Kong, creating 1,500 new asset management positions, the grade A office market in Central, Admiralty and West Kowloon would benefit from 150,000 sq ft of additional take-up. In the housing market, demand for high-end homes would increase by 2 per cent if the relocations occurred within a year, Citigroup said.
That said, tax competition is not a key determinant of the performance of Hong Kong’s real estate market. “The read-across to the property market is not that clear,” said Cathie Chung, senior director of research at JLL in Hong Kong. The rivalry between Hong Kong and Singapore has had little bearing on the fundamentals of both cities’ property sectors.

The heavy influence of mainland China on Hong Kong’s economy, Singapore’s safe-haven status, the vastly different supply-demand dynamics in both markets, the importance of domestic demand in Singapore’s housing market and a much more decentralised office market in Hong Kong have proved far more consequential.
Already in the first quarter of this year – before the launch of Hong Kong’s tax reform – Hong Kong was the second-most actively traded market for residential properties above US$10 million among 12 “super-prime” housing markets tracked by Knight Frank.
Mainland buyers accounted for nearly half the value of new home sales in the two years following the removal of property cooling measures in February 2024, according to Midland Realty data. Tellingly, concerns about Beijing’s clampdown on outbound investment, which could constrain mainland buyers’ ability to fund property purchases in Hong Kong, contributed to the sudden fall in the city’s home prices in July.
Conversely, there is little sign that competition with Hong Kong has had an effect on Singapore’s residential market. In the first half of this year, Singaporean citizens and permanent residents accounted for about 90 per cent of luxury home sales in the city’s core central region. When the stamp duty for foreigners buying any residential property was doubled to 60 per cent in 2023, the collapse in overseas purchases only accentuated the importance of domestic demand.
In fact, speculative activity in Singapore’s public housing system – which houses 80 per cent of Singaporeans – has been a source of concern. The number of second-hand flats resold for at least S$1 million (US$786,000) rose to a record high last quarter despite a slowdown in the broader market.

In the office sector, structural differences far outweigh the impact of competition for capital and talent. In Hong Kong, non-core districts account for more than a third of the city’s office stock. The combination of the steep fall in rents in core locations, a surge in supply in decentralised areas and strong demand for premium buildings in the central business district has led to an unbalanced recovery.
In Singapore, by contrast, the office stock is concentrated in the city’s central business district. Tight supply has contributed to record low vacancy rates for grade A offices. Even grade B buildings are experiencing rental growth. “No greenfield office sites were sold since 2017 in an effort to redevelop the CBD,” said Tricia Song, head of research for Southeast Asia at CBRE.
In the two cities’ commercial property investment markets, safety and liquidity are the key factors. Among the leading cities in the Asia-Pacific, Singapore was the second-most actively traded market after Tokyo in the first half of this year, according to MSCI data.
Cross-border investors have accounted for the bulk of deals this year, with volumes on course to reach a record high for the year as a whole. Investors are drawn to Singapore’s “safe-haven status [and] robust supply of investment-grade assets,” CBRE said.
While tax exemptions for fund managers are a big deal for the asset management industry, they are a sideshow to the forces driving property markets in Hong Kong and Singapore.


Macau kingpin’s former ‘love nest’ finally sells for HK$81m in cut-price deal

Hong Kong celebrity Jeffrey Ngai splashes out on US$16,000 rental home

Which overseas property markets will be the winners and losers if Fed raises US rates?

US$1.6 billion levy complicates sale of Singapore land by Malaysian king’s son

Asia housing and property

Hong Kong and Singapore property shrug off fund tax breaks

Tram cars traverse the streets of Hong Kong’s Central district on January 26. As the city competes harder with Singapore for investment talent, tax incentives for fund managers have emerged as the new battleground. Photo: Jelly Tse

People gather next to the Merlion statue at the Marina Bay waterfront in Singapore. Photo: AFP

A worker supported on safety ropes paints the facade of a block of flats in Singapore on June 29. Photo: AFP

Hong Kong, Singapore aren’t ‘enemies’, our competition is healthy, envoy says

Singapore Consul General Eric Teo at his office in Admiralty. Photo: Jonathan Wong

Consul General Eric Teo has called for “win-win collaboration” in wealth management. Photo: Jonathan Wong

Singapore is used by some companies to gain a foothold in Southeast Asia. Photo: EPA-EFE

Singapore’s carrots for fund managers set to sharpen competition with Hong Kong

A woman walks past the financial business district in Singapore. Photo: AFP

A view of Exchange Square in Hong Kong’s financial district. Photo: Jelly Tse

Hong Kong financiers press for tax breaks after Singapore unveils rival scheme

Singapore's monetary authority and finance ministry have announced measures including a tax exemption for investment profits. Photo: Shutterstock

Assets under management in Hong Kong’s asset and wealth-management industry rose 20 per cent year on year to a record US$5.4 trillion in 2025. Photo: Sam Tsang

Hong Kong will approve tax breaks for fund managers ‘soon’ to boost economy: KPMG

The Hong Kong government is expected to pass a bill offering tax breaks to hedge funds which will potentially attract investment and new talent to the global city. Photo: Jelly Tse

Opinion

Asia Opinion

News

Asia

Southeast Asia

Hong Kong

Property

While the two cities compete on wealth management incentives to draw talent and capital, the spillover into office and residential real estate remains negligible


While the two cities compete on wealth management incentives to draw talent and capital, the spillover into office and residential real estate remains negligible.


Hong Kong property

Singapore

The View

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column

Hong Kong and Singapore property shrug off fund tax breaks

.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}While the two cities compete on wealth management incentives to draw talent and capital, the spillover into office and residential real estate remains negligible

While the two cities compete on wealth management incentives to draw talent and capital, the spillover into office and residential real estate remains negligible