Vietnamese crab exporterdouble-skinned crabs
Advertisement
Ukraine war
OpinionWorld Opinion
Opinion
Hao Nan

How the West’s sanctions against Russia are fuelling a protracted war

For hubs of transit trade from Armenia to the UAE, economic self-interest is best served by having sanctions on Russia in place indefinitely

3-MIN READ3-MIN
2
Listen
A “Give peace a chance” mural depicting musician John Lennon overlooks anti-drone nets along a road in the city of Izyum in Ukraine on December 12. Photo: EPA
Hao Nan is a Susan Strange Associate Fellow with the Helsinki Geoeconomics Society, and a Nuclear Futures Fellow with Ploughshares Fund & Horizon 2045.
As Washington, Kyiv, Moscow and European capitals negotiate an agreement for a Ukraine-Russia ceasefire, debate has snapped back to familiar questions: how much land Ukraine should surrender, what security guarantees can be offered and when sanctions might be lifted. Lost in this argument is a quieter reality. After more than three years of war, the sanctions regime has created a profitable shadow economy from the South Caucasus to the Gulf – one that now has a vested interest in keeping the conflict simmering rather than ending it.
When the West imposed unprecedented sanctions on Russia, the goal was clear: cripple its war machine and force a retreat from Ukraine. Paradoxically, Russia’s economy, though wounded, continues to function and countries such as Armenia, Kazakhstan, Turkey and the United Arab Emirates are witnessing surging trade and economic growth.

This is not a sign of the sanctions’ failure, but an unintended consequence of their design. By closing the front door to Russia, the West has inadvertently flung open the side and back doors, creating a perverse economic ecosystem that may be incentivising a prolonged, low-intensity war.

Select Voice
Select Speed
1x
AI-generated voice