appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Stephen Roach

Fifty years ago this month, Richard Nixon resigned as US president. With all eyes on November’s presidential election, the anniversary provides an occasion to consider the inherent contradictions of American political leadership.
Nixon’s abuses of executive power contrasted sharply with his foreign policy achievements. As an avowed anti-communist, he surprised the world by going to China in 1972. Nixon’s triangulation strategy effectively isolated the former Soviet Union, ultimately helping to bring the Cold War to an end.
Could such a breakthrough happen again? The looming superpower clash between the United States and China certainly begs for another strategic breakthrough. The two countries are on a collision course with no realistic off-ramp. It wouldn’t take much – an incident in the Taiwan Strait or the South China Sea, or an escalation of US containment policy – to trigger conflict escalation.
Former president Donald Trump, should he win in November, seems unlikely to resolve the US-China conflict. As he did in his first administration, he intends to lead with tariffs. Trump has proposed raising US tariffs on Chinese imports to between 50 per cent and 60 per cent after having raised them during his first administration from 3 per cent in early 2018 to 19 per cent in 2020.
As was the case with Trump’s earlier tariffs, this effort would backfire. For starters, tariffs are a tax on Chinese exporters that raise prices for US consumers. According to recent research by the Peterson Institute of International Economics, the additional costs from Trump’s new proposed tariffs would be at least 1.8 per cent of GDP, nearly five times those caused by his first round.
Second, tariffs on China do not reduce the overall trade deficit for a savings-short US economy. Instead, they shift the deficit to other, largely higher-cost, foreign producers. That is what happened after Trump’s initial tariffs: the bilateral imbalance with China shrank, but increased deficits with other countries more than offset it.




US Vice-President Kamala Harris, by contrast, appears to have no intention to up the ante on tariffs. But she does seem inclined to endorse President Joe Biden’s “small yard, high fence” doctrine. That would include a continuation of Biden’s tariffs (largely carried over from Trump) and targeted sanctions, along with de-risking and friendshoring strategies.
While less aggressive than Trump’s potential mega tariffs, the anti-China approach that Harris inherits from Biden would hardly de-escalate tensions.
The two candidates seem likely to hold different views on Taiwan. In a June interview with Bloomberg Businessweek, Trump emphasised a more transactional approach to defending Taiwan. He argued that, like an insurance premium, “Taiwan should pay us for defence”. Trump has previously taken the same stance – that wealthy countries should pay for US protection – with Europe, Nato and even Japan.
I am not in favour of a mercenary approach to US foreign policy. But I must concede that Trump’s tactics could well shift the burden of deterring Beijing from the US to Taiwan. This could be a positive development, to the extent that it reduces direct tensions between the two superpowers. But it would still be far from a strategic recipe for conflict resolution.
While neither Trump nor Harris are predisposed toward ending the US-China conflict, there is a potential twist that hints at a Nixonian breakthrough with China: Harris’ selection of Minnesota Governor Tim Walz as her running mate.


Like former US president George H.W. Bush, who served as chief of the US Liaison Office in Beijing in 1974-75, Walz has a special connection with China. He first travelled there as a teacher in 1989, during the tragic events in Tiananmen Square, which shaped his views on what he later described as China’s “unthinkable” tendencies. Walz even chose to get married on June 4, 1994, the fifth anniversary of the Tiananmen tragedy.
But, in addition to his concerns about human rights and Chinese military aggression in the South China Sea, Walz has also stressed the importance of a sustainable US-China relationship, arguing that dialogue is essential and “absolutely has to happen”. In other words, he would bring a pragmatism that is sorely missing from the US stance towards China.
Vice-presidents rarely shape major policy initiatives. But, in this case, Walz’s views on China raise the chances of a Nixon-like initiative by a Harris administration. Harris and Walz share concerns about Chinese human rights and South China Sea tensions. But they also recognise the need to face the urgent imperative for a course correction in a troubled Sino-American relationship.


This nuanced perspective would allow them to walk and chew gum at the same time. It would encourage them to prioritise re-engagement over digging in their heels at every point of friction in a conflicted relationship. That is what freed Nixon to put aside his ideological biases and engage China in 1972. Walz might well help tip the scales for Harris’ China policy.
Many of today’s geostrategic circumstances are eerily similar to the Cold War climate half a century ago. Who better than a thoughtful new US president to mitigate a dangerous dynamic with another superpower and shift the relationship from conflict escalation to conflict resolution?
Under the watch of Trump and Biden, America’s China problem went from bad to worse. If Harris prevails in November, that need not be the case.
Stephen S. Roach, a faculty member at Yale University and former chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia, is the author of Unbalanced: The Codependency of America and China. Copyright: Project Syndicate


Meet Jonathan Steinberg, ex-Fox News anchor Maria Bartiromo’s multimillionaire husband

Chinese national charged with voter fraud during 2024 US presidential election

Trump approval rating falls to 33%, lowest of his presidency, poll finds

Joe Biden’s prostate cancer is spreading and causing him pain, son Hunter says

US presidential election 2024

Kamala Harris could be the next Richard Nixon on US-China relations

Democratic presidential nominee and current US Vice-President Kamala Harris, centre, and vice-presidential nominee Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, right, listen to First Lady Jill Biden speak during the Democratic National Convention in Chicago on August 19. Photo: AP

Iran to blame for hacks targeting Trump, Biden-Harris campaigns: US intelligence officials

Republican presidential nominee and former US president Donald Trump in York, Pennsylvania on Monday. Photo: Getty Images via AFP

US President Joe Biden with Democratic presidential nominee and Vice-President Kamala Harris. Photo: AP 

Trump campaign spokesman Steven Cheung at Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster, New Jersey on Thursday. Photo: Bloomberg

Kamala Harris’ economic plan could be what US voters will settle for

US vice-president and Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris, and second gentleman Doug Emhoff (far right), call prospective voters from a campaign field office in Rochester, Pennsylvania, on August 18. Photo: AFP

Former US president and Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump holds boxes of Tic Tac during a campaign rally in Asheville, North Carolina, on August 14. Photo: AFP

A person walks out of a polling station after voting early, on August 18, in Miami, Florida. Photo: Miami Herald/AP

Trump advisers push even higher target for Nato defence spending

Republican US presidential candidate Donald Trump prepares to speak at an event in Las Vegas on July 8. Photo: TNS

US President Joe Biden speaks at a news conference after the Nato Summit in Washington on July 11. Photo: AP

Trump’s proposed China import tariffs would hit average Americans like a US$1,700 ‘tax increase’, researchers find

If Donald Trump retakes the US presidency and imposes across-the-board tariffs on imports, the added costs would be paid by American consumers, according to research findings. Photo: AFP

If Donald Trump retakes the US presidency and imposes across-the-board tariffs on imports, the added costs would be paid by American consumers, according to research findings. Photo: Xinhua

Opinion

World Opinion

News

World

United States & Canada

Vice-presidential nominee Tim Walz’s views on China raise the chances of a badly needed Nixon-like initiative by a Harris administration


Vice-presidential nominee Tim Walz’s views on China raise the chances of a badly needed Nixon-like initiative by a Harris administration.


US-China relations

Diplomacy

Tim Walz

Kamala Harris

Donald Trump

50 years since Nixon visited China

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Kamala Harris could be the next Richard Nixon on US-China relations

.css-1mniedq{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;}Vice-presidential nominee Tim Walz’s views on China raise the chances of a badly needed Nixon-like initiative by a Harris administration

Vice-presidential nominee Tim Walz’s views on China raise the chances of a badly needed Nixon-like initiative by a Harris administration