appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Edward Yang Liu

As conflict in the Middle East sends marine insurance costs surging, Hong Kong has an opening to prove that it is more than a port city by becoming a trusted centre for risk pricing, legal certainty and maritime resilience.
When tensions rise in the Middle East, the first signs of trouble in global shipping do not always appear at sea. Often, they appear in the insurance market. Premiums jump. Underwriters retreat. Shipowners rethink routes. Long before a vessel is struck, the cost of moving goods already changes.
That is why Hong Kong’s efforts to build a war-risk insurance mechanism for shipping deserve more attention than they have received. On the surface, this looks like a specialist insurance story. In reality, it points to a larger question: who has the institutional capacity to keep trade moving when private markets turn defensive?
That question matters especially for China, the world’s largest trading nation, and for Hong Kong, which has spent years trying to define what remains distinctive about its role as an international shipping centre.
For a long time, shipping competition was understood mainly in physical terms: bigger ports, larger fleets, faster turnaround, more efficient logistics. Those things still matter, but they are no longer enough. In an age of geopolitical shocks, shipping is also a business of risk pricing, legal certainty, dispute resolution and market trust. The places that matter most are not just those that can move cargo, but those that can keep cargo moving when the political climate worsens.
Marine insurance is easy to ignore in calm periods because it works quietly in the background. In moments of crisis, its importance becomes impossible to miss. If cover becomes unavailable, unaffordable or unreliable, the effects spread quickly. Shipping rarely stops all at once. More often, it begins to seize up.




Hong Kong has an unusual opportunity here. This is not because it can outmatch every shipping centre on scale; rather, it occupies a position that few others do. It sits at the meeting point of two systems: one an international commercial tradition built on common law, arbitration and globally recognisable business practices, and the other China’s huge trade volume, shipping demand and need for more resilient trade links.
That gives Hong Kong a role more important than simply being another place where insurance is sold. It can serve as an interface between Chinese demand and international rules, between Asian shipping realities and global risk markets, and between strategic need and commercially credible institutions.
This matters because marine insurance has never been just a neutral market service. It is also part of the power structure in global shipping. London’s enduring influence rests not only on history but on legal forms, insurance traditions, arbitration practices and liability principles shaped there over decades. In shipping, market power and rule-making power are closely connected.
That is the real gap China still faces. It has ships, ports and cargo on a global scale, but becoming a true maritime power requires more than physical capacity. It requires the ability to price risk, sustain coverage in volatile conditions, settle disputes and offer institutions that others trust.
This is why Hong Kong’s insurance role should not be judged too narrowly by whether it can offer cheaper cover than established markets during a crisis. If that is all the city achieves, its significance will remain limited. The more important test is whether Hong Kong can help build a more intelligent and regionally informed way of assessing maritime risk.


Traditional war-risk markets often react in broad strokes: raise premiums across the board, tighten terms and treat large groups of vessels as if they face roughly the same exposure. That caution is understandable, but blunt pricing is not the same as good pricing.
If developed properly, a Hong Kong-based mechanism could do something more refined. It could draw on closer knowledge of Asian shipping routes, Chinese cargo structures, vessel ownership patterns and regional political conditions. Over time, that could allow Hong Kong to offer cheaper cover in some cases as well as better pricing and steadier expectations for shipowners operating in and around Asia.
Still, Hong Kong should resist the temptation to oversell what can be built quickly. Credibility in maritime insurance is not built by announcement. It is built through underwriting discipline, claims handling, legal interpretation, dispute resolution and market confidence. What matters is whether a system will hold when conditions deteriorate.
That is why Hong Kong’s best path is not to promise disruption but to build indispensability. It must shape risk standards suited to Asian conditions, connect mainland insurers and shipping interests to an internationally legible market environment, strengthen the legal chain behind insurance and look beyond Chinese shipowners to clients across Southeast Asia, the Middle East and other emerging markets.
The future of shipping competition will not be decided simply by who can move goods most efficiently. It will also be shaped by who can keep goods moving when the world becomes more dangerous, with costs still manageable, risks still insurable and disputes still resolvable. In that contest, insurance is not a side business. It is part of the architecture of economic security.
For Hong Kong, that could be the clearest maritime opportunity left: not to simply handle trade but help provide the rules, trust and risk infrastructure that make trade possible at all. In a more fractured world, that kind of quiet power matters more than ever.


Hong Kong’s IOMed poised to play key role in resolving Greater Bay Area disputes

3,800 Hong Kong food outlets offering up to 30% off to celebrate National Day

Hong Kong exports surge 53% to HK$667.9 billion, second highest on record

Hong Kong vows safe Apec meeting with plans for terror and cyberattack threats

Hong Kong economy

How war-risk marine insurance can set Hong Kong apart

A general view of Kwai Tsing Container Terminals on March 4. Photo: Elson Li

Why CY Leung thinks Hong Kong needs to strengthen maritime-related sectors

The political heavyweight has said the city should adopt big-picture thinking when it comes to unpredictable global developments to minimise exposure to disruptions. Photo: Elson Li

Leung Chun-ying pointed out that Hong Kong was not an energy-intensive economy, while mainland China had shifted towards “new energy” sources. Photo: Jonathan Wong

SeaKapital CEO Kenneth Lam has said that prolonged geopolitical disruptions, which raise fuel costs, may drive up global inflation as the end-users would ultimately foot the bill. Photo: Jonathan Wong

As Hong Kong recalibrates, the blue economy offers an anchor

The CM Hong Kong docking in Tsing Yi in 2025. Hong Kong completed its first green methanol bunkering operation in March 2026, supplying biomethanol and fossil methanol to the ship. Photo: Dickson Lee


Ovation of the Seas docking at Kai Tak Cruise Terminal in 2025, a year when cruise ship calls in Hong Kong reached 189. Photo: Dickson Lee

Hong Kong has a strong foundation to lead in financing the marine economy. Photo: Sun Yeung

Why set a limit for Hong Kong’s ride-hailing services?

Taxis and other vehicles are seen on Harcourt Road in Central on September 5, 2025. Photo: Jelly Tse

Online ride-hailing service apps are seen on a mobile phone as a local taxi drives past in Tsim Sha Tsui on August 29, 2025. Photo: Jelly Tse

A driver in a car offering ride-hailing services on September 5, 2025. Photo: Elson Li

Opinion

Hong Kong Opinion

News

Hong Kong

Hong Kong Economy

Marine insurance is part of the power structure in global shipping. It reveals a real gap China still faces, which Hong Kong can fill


Marine insurance is part of the power structure in global shipping. It reveals a real gap China still faces, which Hong Kong can fill.


Insurance

Hong Kong shipping and logistics

Transport and logistics

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


How war-risk marine insurance can set Hong Kong apart

.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}Marine insurance is part of the power structure in global shipping. It reveals a real gap China still faces, which Hong Kong can fill

Marine insurance is part of the power structure in global shipping. It reveals a real gap China still faces, which Hong Kong can fill