appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Robert Delaney

US President Donald Trump’s proclamation last week that he would bar Harvard University from enrolling new international students put the spotlight back on an unprecedented stand-off between the White House and America’s pre-eminent university.
Trump’s move came less than a week after a federal court injunction blocked the US Department of Homeland Security’s termination of Harvard’s ability to host international students.
It was also just hours after the administration threatened Columbia University’s accreditation standing, contending that the New York school – like Harvard, an Ivy League university whose founding predated the creation of the United States – had permitted antisemitism on campus.
The hardline measures underscored Trump’s determination to keep elite education in his crosshairs as part of a wider culture war that defines his political brand and raise fresh questions about whether they will be able to survive an onslaught that does not appear to have an off-ramp.
With many governmental measures targeting international students – or those from mainland China and Hong Kong, in particular – on national security grounds before US courts, the price that America’s most prestigious universities will pay is unclear.
Muddying the picture even more, Trump has made comments over the past week suggesting that Chinese students are welcome, topping them off with an all-caps green light for Chinese students when, on Wednesday, he trumpeted a long-awaited trade deal with China as “done”, once Chinese President Xi Jinping approves.
“WE WILL PROVIDE TO CHINA WHAT WAS AGREED TO, INCLUDING CHINESE STUDENTS USING OUR COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES (WHICH HAS ALWAYS BEEN GOOD WITH ME!),” he posted on his Truth Social account.
Given Trump’s erratic dealmaking approach, it is not known whether the overture amounted to posturing that the president could reverse the moment he hits a snag with China.

And other measures still stand, including an executive order to intensify scrutiny of international students and staff on campuses and initiatives to review social media posts of visa holders and a State Department directive to stop scheduling student visa interviews as it considers more expansive vetting of the social media profiles of applicants.
Harvard and Columbia are regularly in the headlines. But the finances of many hundreds of colleges – as well as the state economies they support – are just as, if not more, vulnerable to any federal attempt to block international students.
Take, for example, the University of Missouri, in Columbia – the Midwestern state’s largest university and a major research centre. According to the Institute for International Education, Missouri is one of 11 US states that derived more than US$1 billion in “economic benefits” from international students in 2024, and the university has a higher-than-average financial dependence on this group.
China ranks second, behind India, as the source of international students attending American schools, but – at nearly 100,000 – Chinese nationals are still the most numerous on the undergraduate level, which is more lucrative because few colleges offer financial aid to students from abroad and undergraduates do not take lower-level academic positions that some graduate students occupy.
The IIE pegs the “economic benefit” in 2024 that Missouri derived from the tuition that international students pay at US$1.1 billion, or 0.31 per cent of the state’s total GDP.
That is roughly double the financial contribution that international students brings to California. IIE puts that amount at US$6.4 billion, or 0.16 per cent of the West Coast state’s economy, which has the attraction of hi-tech’s Silicon Valley, led by Apple, Nvidia and other globally competitive companies.


A similar dynamic plays out among thousands of American universities, where the top 10 schools in US News and World Report’s benchmark college rankings, like Harvard – with large endowments and wealthy donor bases – enjoy a degree of financial cushioning that many others do not.
Consider the revenues generated by foreign students relative to total revenues at two private schools: the Washington University of St. Louis in Missouri and Stanford University in California, each with undergraduate populations of just over 8,000.
At 21 in the US News and World Report rankings, Washington University derived an “economic benefit” of US$322 million from its international students in 2024, supporting 3,537 jobs, according to data compiled by the Association of International Educators, also known as Nafsa. That benefit represents 6.3 per cent of the school’s 2024 operating budget.
Ranked No 4, Stanford took in US$292 million from overseas students, supporting 3,126 jobs, and representing only 3 per cent of its 2024 expenditures.
Chinese students – and the tuition they pay – have become vital for state universities, particularly after the financial crisis of 2008, when state governments were forced to cut education budgets, according to Yingyi Ma, a professor at Syracuse University and author of Ambitious and Anxious: How Chinese Undergraduates Succeed and Struggle in American Higher Education.
“Chinese students, for many, many years have been full-pay students, if not more,” she said. “Some places charge additional fees for international students … and so the tuition is provide a very important buffer for American universities. Many of them are really cash-strapped, especially the state universities.”
For example, the numbers for the University of Delaware, which is subsidised by the mid-Atlantic state’s government, reflect an even deeper dependence on Chinese students, who account for as much as 64 per cent of its international student body, according to the school.
Endowments among the most elite schools can also be a differentiating factor when it comes to surviving a dip in international enrolment or any unforeseen financial pitfall. At US$36 billion, Stanford’s is three times that of Washington University’s US$12 billion and 20 times that of the University of Delaware’s US$1.8 billion.
It is not clear how aggressive the State Department will be in carrying out Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s pledge to “aggressively” revoke visas issued to Chinese students, particularly those with “connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields”.
Asked a day after Rubio’s announcement to explain how applications for student visas would be reviewed, State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce declined, citing national security and saying she would “not be getting into the details not only … regarding the scrutiny and the methods regarding the visa itself, but also when it comes to critical fields”.
The department did not immediately respond to a query on Wednesday about Trump’s welcome to Chinese students earlier in the day.

Since STEM fields – science, technology, engineering and mathematics – are generally understood to be what most governments consider “critical”, the new visa policy could significantly harm the Missouri University of Science and Technology.
Nafsa estimated the economic benefit that international students bring to the school, , another state-financed institution, at US$32 million, which represents 14 per cent of its revenues for the full year 2024.
More generally, hundreds of American universities beyond the top 10 face more daunting challenges if Rubio’s cuts are substantial. And many prospective Chinese applicants are already making contingency plans.
Under the new circumstances, said Tracy Shao, a study-abroad consultant, Chinese students and their parents are worried.
“Despite the impact on confidence, families with sufficient economic strength on the mainland still choose the United States as their first choice for studying abroad, and would rather take risks to go there,” Shao said.
“However, due to the current situation, families applying to American universities now also apply to some top universities in Hong Kong and the United Kingdom, no longer considering the United States as the only choice, and the number of mixed applications has increased significantly.”
David You, 23, a computer science and engineering graduate student at the Georgia Institute of Technology, said that for students who have not yet come to the US, concern over Rubio’s policy is inescapable.
”My visa is only valid for one year, so I’m kind of stuck in here,” he said. “Same thing happened to my friends as well.
“We decided not to go back to China for summer vacation because we’re afraid that we’re not able to return to US afterwards.”
Additional reporting by Carl Zhang in Hong Kong


Chinese President Xi Jinping will pay state visit to US this week, Beijing confirms

Neither the US nor China can win the AI race alone, BofA analyst says

Xi to get presidential airport welcome from Trump during US visit starting Wednesday

Chinese province urges firms to seize the day as Xi-Trump meeting provides trade stability

US-China relations

Trump’s crackdown on international students affects far more US schools than Harvard

Harvard banners during the university’s 374th  commencement ceremonies in Cambridge, Massachusetts, on May 29. US President Donald Trump’s battle with the school obscures the impact restrictions on student visas will have at hundreds of other American colleges. Photo: AFP

US President Donald Trump with cadet Chris Verdugo during commencement ceremonies at West Point Military Academy in West Point, New York, on May 24. Photo: Reuters

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in May that his department would “aggressively” revoke visas to students from China, long a top source of revenue for US universities. Photo: AFP

Rubio seeks probe of Harvard collaboration on conference in China, report says

Demonstrators rally on Cambridge Common in a protest in April calling on Harvard leadership to resist interference at the university by the federal government. Photo: Reuters

American dream no more? Asian students rethink US education plans amid visa clampdown

People enter and exit the Harry Elkins Widener Memorial Library on the Harvard University campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Photo: AFP

People walk and ride along the campus of Stanford University on May 30. Stanford is among seven US universities placed in the top 20 of the 2025 QS World University Rankings. Photo: EPA-EFE

People hold up signs during a rally in support of international students at Harvard University’s campus in Massachusetts on May 27. Photo: TNS

A poster of Harvard University is seen on the wall at an overseas education agency in Beijing on May 29. Photo: AFP

Harvard Chinese student’s graduation speech strikes a chord as Trump leads crackdown

Yurong “Luanna” Jiang delivers her speech at Harvard University on May 29. Photo: AP

Hong Kong must ‘seize opportunities’ to attract talent amid US student visa woes

A student walks past the statue of John Harvard. US President Trump has sought to bar the entry of foreign nationals to Harvard University. Photo: Reuters

(From left) Professor Philip Chiu, dean of CUHK’s medicine faculty; Albert Wong, CEO of HKSTP; and HKU Professor Wallace Lau. Hong Kong’s top academics have said the China-US rivalry opens doors for talent to join the city. Photo: May Tse

Graduates gather during the commencement ceremony at Harvard University. The university is at the centre of US student tensions. Photo: AFP

News

China

Diplomacy

World

United States & Canada

Economy, Trade & Business

Financial repercussions of blocking foreign students and tuition would be felt by hundreds of colleges and the state economies they support


Financial repercussions of blocking foreign students and tuition would be felt by hundreds of colleges and the state economies they support.


Trump’s crackdown on international students affects far more US schools than Harvard

.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}Financial repercussions of blocking foreign students and tuition would be felt by hundreds of colleges and the state economies they support

Financial repercussions of blocking foreign students and tuition would be felt by hundreds of colleges and the state economies they support