Opinion

Chinese legislature’s right to interpret Hong Kong laws should be respected in the West

The US consul general’s warning of an erosion of judicial independence fails to understand the nature of Hong Kong’s ‘high degree of autonomy’

The power of interpretation in a civil law system is legislative in nature, not judicial, and it deals with the constitutional or legislative intent of a law, rather than specific cases

3-MIN READ3-MIN

The Great Hall of the People in Beijing, where the National People’s Congress annual meetings are held, is seen on March 5 last year. Photo: Xinhua

Ronny Tong, SC, was chairman of the Hong Kong Bar Association from 1999 to 2001, and was first elected a member of the Legislative Council in 2004.

Published: 8:15am, 3 Feb 2023

US consul general for Hong Kong and Macau Gregory May recently lamented that the latest interpretation of the Hong Kong national security law by the National People’s Congress Standing Committee could erode the independence of the city’s judiciary.

Such a view suggests May has not understood the Sino-British Joint Declaration or the Hong Kong Basic Law, which would be regrettable given his role as US envoy to Hong Kong. But more disconcerting is the fact that such a misunderstanding appears to be pervasive, at least as far as the West is concerned. So let’s try to clear this up once and for all.

First, the single most important fact of the Joint Declaration is China and the UK’s reaffirmation of Chinese sovereignty over Hong Kong. This is in fact; not in name only. It includes not only China’s right to administer Hong Kong, whether directly or indirectly, but also its right to defend and preserve its sovereignty.