appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Dong Lei

There is considerable reason for China to pursue a policy of discreet mediation of the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Such a policy is in China’s own interests and would benefit the global economy, but these factors are not the most critical considerations.
Some argue that China should accept the virtue of Western sanctions and condemn Russia. Meanwhile, certain extreme internet users want Beijing to aid Russia or stand idly by as the world burns.
There are arguments for these positions and both sides of the conflict, based on morality, international law and national interest, and each merits review. However, perhaps most salient of all the considerations is the shape and character of the world we hope one day to inhabit.
To determine which course of action to pursue, we must think beyond the exigencies of the moment and even how these calamitous events affect our own tribe and nation. This requires struggling to grasp the position most opposite to our own, if not to embrace it, then to better understand it.
It bears remembering that the ties – and animosities – between Russia and Ukraine stretch back to the Slavic-Viking kingdom of the ninth-century Kievan Rus; that despite repeatedly expressed concerns about the eastward encroachment of Nato, Western powers encouraged and legitimised a coup against the democratically elected Ukranian leader Viktor Yanukovych in 2014; that this exacerbated Russia’s worries about an unfriendly alliance’s push towards a border over which it has repeatedly been invaded in recent centuries.
Why pushing China to take sides in Ukraine conflict may not end well for US
And that, in Kosovo, Iraq, Libya and elsewhere, the same nations that are so righteously indignant about infringements on Ukraine’s sovereignty repeatedly ignored these norms when it suited their interests. These double standards do not justify this war, but they cannot be entirely dismissed.
It would be foolish to propagate or blindly accept a narrative of the Russia-Ukraine conflict as simply the newest episode of a good, noble and democratic West struggling mightily against a vile, debauched and despotic East.
To conceptualise the dispute this way does China few favours, whichever side it takes. Such narrow Orientalism dates at least to the time of Augustus’ skilled propaganda against Antony and Cleopatra, but this tradition does little to help end the conflict. Moreover, it does much to continue it, and perhaps this is even part of the point.

Many extremists on both sides seem almost to want the war to continue, certain that total victory for their side will bring vindication and geopolitical advantage. In reality, the results of this black-and-white world view are yet more blood, pain and deprivation, and it is this result that China should expend its capital and efforts to prevent, regardless of threat or entreaty, from friend or foe.
Whatever one believes about the historicity of Ukrainian nationalism or the Russian right to pre-emptive self-defence in its near abroad, the fact remains that this conflict is already causing immense and increasing problems in the world today.
However tempting it might be to challenge why the lives and well-being of Europeans seem so disproportionately valuable to Westerners in comparison to Congolese, Afghan or Yemeni ones, this conflict will undeniably produce massive hardships across the globe, metastasising the longer it continues.


Consider the additional implications, among other things, of Ukraine ranking among the world’s leading exporters of wheat, and then ask how many people in the developing world should starve to perpetuate this war.
China’s interest in guiding this conflict towards a quick resolution is clear, and not only for its own stake in building a more stable, predictable and interconnected environment in which to conduct business.
Nor should it pursue mediation just for the sake of critical international law principles that proscribe interference in the internal affairs of other sovereign nations, norms China has steadfastly and admirably upheld over many decades.
First and foremost, China should guide this conflict towards a rapid end because reducing human suffering is the right thing to do. It should do so because we cannot afford to allow the world to drift into armed camps of self-righteous egotism and a new cold war. A world is which China pursues international harmony is a safer, better world for all.
Dong Lei is a non-practising solicitor in Hong Kong and is the principal at AB Highwood Consultants


UK will not ‘tolerate intimidation’, foreign secretary tells Iran

Pat on the back? Xi and Trump’s body language speaks volumes

Inside Melania Trump and Peng Liyuan’s visit to the Smithsonian’s Peacock Room

Costa Rica’s foreign minister fired for attending Trump meeting without telling president

Diplomacy

China need not pick a side in Russia-Ukraine war, but it should mediate for peace

A child refugee from Kharkiv plays in the humanitarian aid centre of Dnipro city council, Dnipro, Ukraine, on March 28. China should guide the conflict towards a rapid end because reducing human suffering is the right thing to do. Photo: EPA-EFE

China’s Ambassador to the UN, Zhang Jun, addresses a General Assembly meeting on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, in New York, US, on March 24. Photo: EPA-EFE

Drums of war drown out cries of hunger

A woman checks bread in Cairo. In Egypt, bread is a staple food for tens of millions and soaring prices have sparked serious unrest in the past. Photo: Reuters

China’s private firms see Russia as land of opportunity, up for grabs amid West’s exodus

Private firms in China may be able to cash in as established Western brands pull out of Russia. Photo: Reuters

China’s trade with Russia could be boosted as smaller private Chinese firms look to fill the void left as many Western companies have pulled out of Russia. Photo: Getty Images

Ukraine war: sanctions on Russia show the power of a weaponised US dollar

A Russian rouble coin is pictured with US dollar bills and a US$1 coin in Moscow, on March 15. The dollar benefits not just the US but also its users, who create an ecosystem that entrenches its superiority. Photo: AFP

No legal basis for US to impose its hegemony on China over Ukraine

Illustration: Stephen Case

Ukraine crisis calls for China to take part in a daring diplomatic intervention

Illustration: Craig Stephens

Opinion

News

World

China

Knowledge

US-China Relations


Blindly accepting the West’s ‘good-vs-evil’ narrative risks prolonging the crisis, and China is right to resist pressure to choose a side
Instead, it must focus its efforts on securing a speedy resolution to avert further bloodshed and a global food crisis



Blindly accepting the West’s ‘good-vs-evil’ narrative risks prolonging the crisis, and China is right to resist pressure to choose a side. Instead, it must focus on securing a speedy resolution to avert further bloodshed and a global food crisis.


Russia

Ukraine

US-China relations

China-Russia relations

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)
