appConfigEntityId

bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

isVideo

articlePageQuery

article

articleSchemaContent

content

hooksArticlePageAdvertisementConfigArticle

hooksArticlePageFloatingButtonConfigArticle

appConfig

filter

json

liveArticle

Stephen Vines

One of the many things that the big investment banks never saw coming was do-it-yourself IPOs but, as this month’s successful listing by the music streaming company Spotify Technology SA has shown, it most certainly can be done.
Basically, DIY listings involve launching an initial public offering without underwriters, depriving investment banks of mouth-watering fees and the power to set an opening price. 
Also absent from this launch were the company’s founders, who are generally to be found bell-ringing and beaming on first trading days. 
Meanwhile, the New York Stock Exchange took this opportunity to demonstrate the challenges it faces as an international capital-raising centre by briefly raising the Swiss flag to celebrate the Swedish company’s debut – they got it right in the end.
And to get trading under way, the NYSE set an opening reference price for Spotify at US$132, based on pre-IPO price level shares for private trades. Thirty million shares changed hands on the first trading day. An immediate buying spree took the price to US$165.90, settling at US$149.01 by the end of the day, thus valuing the company at a staggering US$26.5 billion – not bad for a business which remains loss-making. 

A revolutionary listing for a revolutionary company (NYSE: $SPOT) pic.twitter.com/q63cNfjlX0
— NYSE (@NYSE) April 3, 2018

Besides money saving, what are the other advantages of a DIY IPO? First up is the obvious advantage of speed and flexibility.
Then there is the matter of equal access, because, unlike conventional IPOs, an underwriter-free launch means that the banks cannot make preferential share allocations. 
The market for the shares is therefore laid out on a level playing field and, as there is no lock-up for existing shareholders, this kind of listing ensures far greater liquidity. The result of this for the Spotify IPO was that some 91 per cent of the shares were tradeable, an unthinkable percentage in normal IPO conditions. 
The downside of doing away with a lock-up period for pre-IPO shareholders is, as the Spotify prospectus warned, that new shareholders are more vulnerable to volatility.
IPO sponsors typically manipulate the market to achieve certain price targets but in the Spotify listing, the market was truly determined by, yup, the market. As the company put it: “It is our belief that the wisdom of crowds trumps expert intervention”.

Is Asia Spotify’s weak spot?
One criticism of this IPO, however, is that Spotify has gone to the market for no apparent reason. It really does not need the floatation’s proceeds as it is sitting on a cash and securities pile totalling some US$1.3 billion, it has not converted any debt into equity for the purposes of the listing, and, at the time of the listing, had a positive cash flow.
Spotify is far from being alone among hi-tech floatations in coming to the market with no specific purpose for raising money. If there is a reason for floating the company, aside from allowing the founding shareholders to cash out, it lies in the need to cover losses that are mounting. Last year, Spotify’s losses totalled €1.24 billion (US$1.5 billion), more than double the €539 million loss in 2016 and €230 million the year before that.
As Spotify’s profits still stagnate, is music streaming dying out?
Investors, in other words, are really being asked to do no more than put money into a company that has yet to demonstrate an ability to make money. It is important to stress that Spotify is not unique in this respect. Indeed, in the past four decades, 38 per cent of companies coming to the US market were loss-making. Some then failed spectacularly, such as Pets.com. Facebook, by contrast, came to the market with a studiously modest profit track record that rapidly gave way to burgeoning revenues after the IPO.

Hi-tech listings have transformed the whole purpose of stock markets, which originated in the 19th century mainly to finance railways. As these markets developed, the scope of funding quickly expanded but, in all cases, investors were asked to put their money into specific projects with heavy capital requirements.
New economy stocks hog the limelight in the age of technology
Nowadays, specific projects are far more likely to be funded by either loans or privately raised capital, often leaving stock markets to act as loss funders where investors follow an idea in the cheerful expectation that it might bear fruit. The extent of their good cheer is seen in the way that bottom lines are disregarded and lack of profitability is readily accepted.
In many ways, this is not that different from what became known as railway mania, which had investors scrambling for a share of the next best thing, leading to a glut of railway offerings and the inevitable bust when it became clear that all these companies could not possibly make money. 
Maybe things have not really changed that much, except for investment bankers who could be shut out from the fun, an eventuality that is most unlikely to provoke universal distress.
Stephen Vines runs companies in the food sector and moonlights as a journalist and a broadcaster


Why Shanghai offers hope for China’s ailing real estate market

To match China’s economy, India must accept its investment

China’s new property presale rules risk prolonging sector downturn

Hong Kong and Singapore property shrug off fund tax breaks

The View

Spotify’s IPO was a success. Never mind that it’s a loss-making company

Spotify’s shares ended up 12.9 per cent higher on its first day of trading on the New York Stock Exchange, on April 3, a smooth debut that could pave the way for other companies looking to go public without the aid of Wall Street underwriters. Photo: Bloomberg

(FILES) This file photo taken on March 22, 2018 shows a computer screen displaying the logo of the social networking site Facebook, taken in Manchester, England. Facebook took out full-page ads in European newspapers on April 16, 2018 to trumpet tough new EU legislation that promises "more data protection for you", as the company seeks to win back trust following a damaging privacy scandal. The new law, set to come into effect on May 25, aims to give users more control over how their personal information is stored and used online, with big fines for firms that break the rules. / AFP PHOTO / Oli SCARFF

Daniel Ek, Founder and CEO of Spotify, speaks onstage at Spotify Press Announcement on May 20, 2015 in New York City. Spotify has announced that subscribers to its Premium music-streaming service will be able to bundle it with Hulu's limited-commercial TV plan for $12.99 a month. (Michael Loccisano/Spotify)

Xiaomi has hired Citic Securities to issue Chinese depositary receipts ahead of Hong Kong IPO

Lei Jun, founder and CEO of China's mobile company Xiaomi gestures during a launch of the company's new products in Beijing on September 27, 2016. Photo: REUTERS

Just how long can tech stocks continue to surge?

Just how much influence will Chinese technology stocks continue to have both on home indices and overseas? Photo: Alamy Stock Photo

one time use only, istock, Technology concept: Dollar sign with circuits - Stock Image

FILE PHOTO: A sign of Tencent is seen during the third annual World Internet Conference in Wuzhen town of Jiaxing, Zhejiang province, China November 16, 2016. REUTERS/Aly Song/File Photo

Tencent-backed fashion app seeking US$4 billion US IPO

Models present a creation from the G-Star & Dickies which is presented by JD, the online shopping platform, during China Fashion Week in Beijing on March 29, 2017. Photo: Simon Song

Opinion

Business

Stephen Vines says while most companies go to market to raise money, with its DIY listing on the New York Stock Exchange, Spotify is asking the market to be a loss funder. That’s far from unusual in hi-tech stock listings


While most companies go to market to raise money, with its DIY listing on the New York Stock Exchange, Spotify is asking the market to be a loss funder. That’s far from unusual in hi-tech stock listings.


Banking & finance

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column